<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#8217;m up to in Online Gaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rog.gameslate.com/2009/11/what-im-up-to-in-online-gaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rog.gameslate.com/2009/11/what-im-up-to-in-online-gaming/</link>
	<description>The world, virtual or real, as Rog sees it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:13:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taekwandean</title>
		<link>http://rog.gameslate.com/2009/11/what-im-up-to-in-online-gaming/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Taekwandean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rog.gameslate.com/?p=1753#comment-293</guid>
		<description>&quot;Overall, I’m usually an optimistic guy when it comes to the games industry, but lately I cannot help but feel there’s this dark corporate storm that’s been taking over development. I wonder how many game designs are being made based on charts of shareholder interest, or via reiterative design in attempts to capture Blizzard’s success.&quot;

This seems pretty much right on to me.  I think that the gaming industry is in a phase where they focus more on &#039;industry&#039; than &#039;gaming&#039;.  The new games on the horizon aren&#039;t offering hardly anything that excites me.  They all seem like the same function with slightly different arguments (if you&#039;ll forgive the math/logic analogy).  I think it will be some time still before someone is willing to invest the time and money into making something really new again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Overall, I’m usually an optimistic guy when it comes to the games industry, but lately I cannot help but feel there’s this dark corporate storm that’s been taking over development. I wonder how many game designs are being made based on charts of shareholder interest, or via reiterative design in attempts to capture Blizzard’s success.&#8221;</p>
<p>This seems pretty much right on to me.  I think that the gaming industry is in a phase where they focus more on &#8216;industry&#8217; than &#8216;gaming&#8217;.  The new games on the horizon aren&#8217;t offering hardly anything that excites me.  They all seem like the same function with slightly different arguments (if you&#8217;ll forgive the math/logic analogy).  I think it will be some time still before someone is willing to invest the time and money into making something really new again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longasc</title>
		<link>http://rog.gameslate.com/2009/11/what-im-up-to-in-online-gaming/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Longasc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rog.gameslate.com/?p=1753#comment-292</guid>
		<description>GW2 in 2011, Cataclysm and Diablo 3 also 2011 IIRC. You could try LOTRO after Mirkwood has been released, they changed combat a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GW2 in 2011, Cataclysm and Diablo 3 also 2011 IIRC. You could try LOTRO after Mirkwood has been released, they changed combat a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
